Dostoevsky Parricide Freud Pdf [EXCLUSIVE]

Click Here ->>->>->> https://shurll.com/2tvy2o

The Oedipal Complex and Epilepsy in Dostoevsky's Life and Works: A Freudian Perspective

In his essay Dostoevsky and Parricide, Sigmund Freud offers a psychoanalytic interpretation of the Russian novelist's personal and artistic struggles. Freud argues that Dostoevsky suffered from an unresolved Oedipus complex, which manifested itself in his epileptic seizures, his gambling addiction, his religious mysticism, and his recurrent theme of patricide in his novels. Freud bases his analysis on biographical data, literary sources, and his own theory of the unconscious.

According to Freud, Dostoevsky had a hostile relationship with his father, who was a tyrannical and abusive alcoholic. Dostoevsky harbored unconscious hatred and resentment towards him, as well as a repressed sexual attraction to his mother. These conflicting feelings created a sense of guilt and anxiety in Dostoevsky, which he tried to alleviate by identifying with his father and adopting his authoritarian and moralistic views. However, this identification was not enough to prevent Dostoevsky from developing a neurotic condition that expressed itself in various forms of self-punishment and self-destruction.

Freud suggests that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was a psychosomatic disorder that originated from his Oedipal conflict. He claims that Dostoevsky experienced his seizures as a form of divine punishment for his sinful thoughts and deeds, especially those related to his father. Freud also links Dostoevsky's epilepsy to his gambling addiction, which he sees as another way of courting danger and risking ruin. Freud believes that Dostoevsky gambled in order to escape from reality and to experience a state of ecstasy that resembled his epileptic aura.

Freud also interprets Dostoevsky's religious mysticism as a consequence of his Oedipal complex. He argues that Dostoevsky sought refuge in Christianity as a means of reconciling with his father and finding forgiveness for his transgressions. Freud notes that Dostoevsky's religion was marked by a paradoxical combination of humility and pride, submission and rebellion, love and hate. Freud attributes this ambivalence to Dostoevsky's unresolved Oedipal feelings, which he projected onto his image of God.

Finally, Freud examines Dostoevsky's literary works, especially The Brothers Karamazov, as expressions of his Oedipal complex. He argues that Dostoevsky created characters that represented different aspects of his own personality and that acted out his unconscious fantasies and conflicts. Freud focuses on the theme of parricide, which he considers to be the central motif of Dostoevsky's oeuvre. He claims that Dostoevsky was fascinated by the idea of killing his father, both literally and symbolically, and that he explored this idea from various perspectives in his novels.

Freud concludes his essay by acknowledging the limitations of his approach and by praising Dostoevsky's artistic genius. He admits that he cannot explain all the aspects of Dostoevsky's life and works by applying his psychoanalytic theory, and that he may have overlooked some important factors and influences. He also recognizes that Dostoevsky was able to transcend his personal problems and create works of universal significance and value. He asserts that Dostoevsky was one of the greatest writers of all time and that he deserved admiration and respect. aa16f39245